ESSAY: Homunculus Redux

ONCE UPON A TIME, at the dawn of the scientific discipline now known as embryology, there was confusion. How did human beings form and grow? Did they develop gradually before birth (“epigenesis”), or did they exist fully formed in egg or sperm, even before conception (“preformationism”)? And how could we know?

In 1677, The Royal Society of London credited a Dutch maker of optics and lenses, Anton Leeuwenhoek, with the discovery under a microscope of motile sperm. Perhaps jealous for the limelight, another Dutch microscopist, Nicolaas Hartsoeker, claimed he had first seen the wriggling specimens a few years earlier, but in his uncertainty about what they were, he humbly did not publicize his observations. Preformationism of the “ovist” (egg) variety was already in the scientific air, and a cavalcade of nonsense claims by scientists about small humans supposedly seen in sperm cells ensued. And by 1694, the reticent microscopist Hartsoeker was nevertheless not too humble to publish his infamous iillustration of a “homunculus” (“little human”), curled up fully-formed inside the head of a sperm cell . . . even though Hartsoeker never claimed actually to have seen such a thing.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/llustration-of-a-homunculus-in-sperm-drawn-by-Nicolaas-Hartsoeker-published-as-part-of_fig3_324484207

From our modern perspective, these claims all seem foolish and irresponsible. Yet, before we laugh too hard at these erstwhile “thought leaders,” and the herd mentality that led so many of them into the ditch of error, we should remember: Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

***

When anyone asks me what the three most important issues facing the Congress [sic], I always give the same answer:

-The children

-The children

-The children

Start of a Tweet by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, June 27, 2019

***

We make a lot of cultural noise about prioritizing “the children,” but our actions often don’t match our rhetoric, and our motives are at best mixed. Despite all our scientific and cultural advances, we still treat children as “homunculi.” We dress them as little adults, advertise directly to them, train them like professional athletes, treat them like co-educators in the classroom; and, in increasingly blatant ways, we pretend they are simply little adults in the realm of sex and sexuality.

Either we still don’t understand how human beings develop and grow – especially psychologically – or we are willing to turn a blind eye to what we do know in order to follow trends, to satisfy adult appetites, and to stay in step with our increasingly transgressive elites.

Safe money says:  the needs and wants of adults will prevail, even if the results harm “the children.”